(© deagreez - stock.adobe.com)
MAASTRICHT, Netherlands — When the COVID-19 pandemic forced millions of people to work from home, many companies and employees were anxious about the impact on productivity. However, a new study suggests the key to making remote work successful may lie in the design and environment of the home office.
Researchers from Maastricht University in the Netherlands surveyed over 1,000 Dutch workers who transitioned to working from home (WFH) during the pandemic. What they found was that the physical characteristics of the home office – from air quality and temperature to the ergonomics of the desk and chair – played a major role in determining productivity, burnout levels, and willingness to continue working remotely.
“The move from the work office to the home office needs to be accompanied by careful design and investment in the quality of the office and its climate,” lead author Martijn Stroom writes in the journal PLOS ONE. “Failure to do so is not only likely to be associated with decreased productivity, but also decreased willingness to work from home, and increased burnout tendency.”
Setting Up a Productive Home Office
The researchers found that higher satisfaction with the home office environment was significantly associated with increased productivity and decreased burnout. Specific factors that made a big difference included:
Air Quality: Participants who reported better ventilation of their home office, either through opening windows or using mechanical systems, had higher satisfaction with the indoor environment. This in turn was linked to a 0.5-point increase (on a 10-point scale) in self-reported productivity, as well as a 0.4-point decrease in burnout tendency (on a 7-point scale) and a 1.2-point increase in willingness to continue working from home (on a 10-point scale).
“We find that ventilating the home office is a crucial underlying factor predicting overall satisfaction and is indirectly associated with increased productivity, increased willingness to WFH, and decreased burnout tendency,” Stroom explains.
Ergonomics: Satisfaction with the desk, chair, computer monitor, and other hardware in the home office was also strongly linked to higher productivity and lower burnout. Participants who were more satisfied with the ergonomics of their home setup tended to report a 0.3 standard deviation increase in productivity.
Overall, the researchers found that improving the physical environment of the home office, through both ventilation and ergonomic upgrades, was key to remote work success. And the benefits went beyond just productivity – better home office conditions were also associated with greater willingness to continue working from home and greater resilience against burnout.
Overcoming the Challenges of Remote Work
The findings challenge some common assumptions about the downsides of remote work. Previous research has suggested that working from home can hurt productivity, damage relationships with coworkers, and lead to burnout.
However, the Maastricht University team found that these issues were largely driven by the physical shortcomings of the home office, rather than inherent problems with remote work itself. By creating a dedicated, comfortable, and well-ventilated workspace, workers were able to maintain high productivity and avoid many of the pitfalls associated with working from home.
“What has gained limited attention is the physical climate of the home office in which work takes place,” the study authors write. “This study investigates the relationship between the home office environment… and self-reported measures of work satisfaction, productivity and burnout tendency.”
The researchers also uncovered some interesting demographic differences. For example, they found that older workers and those with larger households tended to report higher productivity when working from home, while having children present during work hours was associated with decreased productivity and increased burnout.
These results suggest that the success of remote work isn’t just about the job itself, but also the individual’s home environment and personal circ*mstances. Employers may need to take these factors into account when supporting and empowering their remote workforce.
Measuring What Matters
A key insight from the study is the importance of objective measurement, rather than relying solely on self-reported satisfaction. The researchers found that participants’ subjective assessments of air quality, for instance, were not good predictors of actual productivity. It was only when they looked at real behaviors like ventilation that the connection to performance became clear.
“Solely based on self-report analysis, ventilation would have been an unlikely factor considered to improve the success of WFH,” Stroom says. “Our results also suggest that it is crucial to objectively measure the quality of the physical environment, as merely collecting self-reported satisfaction scores might paint an incomplete or even incorrect picture.”
This suggests that employers and employees should think beyond just asking workers how satisfied they are with their home offices. Investing in tools to monitor factors like air quality, temperature, and ergonomics could provide more meaningful insights to optimize the remote work experience.
The Future of Remote Work
As the world continues to grapple with the long-term impacts of the pandemic, the findings from this study offer an important roadmap for the future of remote work. By focusing on the physical environment of the home office, companies and employees can unlock the true potential of working from home – boosting productivity, reducing burnout, and ensuring a sustainable remote work model.
“The physical climate of the home office plays a key role in work-from-home productivity. Different home offices are likely to lead to different willingness to work from home and work-from-home success!” the team concludes in a media release.
Paper Summary
Methodology
The researchers surveyed 1,002 Dutch office workers who were working at least partially from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants answered questions about their home office setup, including factors like desk, chair, and screen satisfaction, as well as indoor environmental conditions like temperature, air quality, lighting, and noise.
They also reported on their own productivity, burnout tendency, and willingness to continue working from home. By analyzing the relationships between these variables, the team was able to identify the key home office factors that predicted successful remote work outcomes.
To add rigor to the analysis, the researchers supplemented the self-reported data with objective information about participants’ home environments, such as the size of their home office, the amount of natural light, and the ventilation methods used.
Key Results
Participants reported higher satisfaction with indoor environmental factors like temperature, air quality, and lighting when working from home versus in the office. However, they were less satisfied with the ergonomics of their home office equipment.
Greater satisfaction with both the home office environment and hardware was significantly associated with higher self-reported productivity and lower burnout tendency.
The amount of time participants spent actively ventilating their home office, either by opening windows or using mechanical systems, was indirectly linked to improved productivity, reduced burnout, and greater willingness to continue working remotely. This effect was fully mediated by higher satisfaction with the overall home office environment.
Older workers and those with larger households tended to report higher productivity when working from home, while the presence of children during work hours was associated with decreased productivity and increased burnout.
Study Limitations
The study had several limitations. As it relied on self-reported data, there could be potential biases or inaccuracies in how participants recalled their pre-pandemic office experiences. The cross-sectional design also means the researchers could not establish definitive causal relationships, only associations between the variables.
Additionally, the extraordinary circ*mstances of the COVID-19 pandemic itself may have influenced participants’ subjective responses in ways that could differ from more typical remote work conditions. The researchers acknowledged these challenges and called for future research using longitudinal designs to further validate the findings.
Discussion & Takeaways
The key takeaway from this study is that the physical characteristics of the home office environment play a crucial role in determining the success of remote work arrangements. By prioritizing factors like air quality, temperature control, and ergonomic furniture, companies and employees can unlock significant productivity gains and reduce the risk of burnout.
Importantly, the research suggests that simply relying on self-reported satisfaction scores may not be enough. Employers should consider objective measurement of home office conditions to get a more accurate picture of how the physical environment is impacting worker performance and well-being.
The findings also highlight the importance of tailoring remote work policies and support to individual circ*mstances. Factors like age, household size, and the presence of children can all influence how well an employee is able to thrive when working from home. Flexibility and personalized solutions may be key to maximizing the benefits of remote work for a diverse workforce.
Overall, this study provides valuable insights for companies and employees navigating the shift to remote and hybrid work models. By creating healthy, comfortable, and well-designed home offices, organizations can position themselves for long-term success in the new world of work.
Funding & Disclosures
The authors received no specific funding for this work. The researchers declare that they have no competing interests.
About StudyFinds Staff
StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.
Read More About StudyFinds
Our Editorial Process
StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate.We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves.All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.
Read More →
Our Editorial Team
Steve Fink
Editor-in-Chief
Chris Melore
Editor
Sophia Naughton
Associate Editor
Related Content
Going vegan vs. Mediterranean diet: Surprising study reveals which is healthier
August 9, 2024
Earth’s inner workings exposed in landmark mantle recovery
August 9, 2024
These 5 Historical Fiction Movies Will Make You Rethink History
August 9, 2024